I need help with my homework Requires Lopeswrite Assessment Description Review the school board policy and student handbook of your local public

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Summary of Due Process Requirements

Summary of the due process requirements prior to a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student at your local site or district.

0 points

School suspension due process requirements are not summarized.

18.5 points

Inadequately summarizes school suspension due process requirements from the policy/handbook investigated. Details of due process are unclear.

19.75 points

Adequately summarizes school suspension due process requirements from the policy/handbook investigated. Some details of the due process may be vague.

21.75 points

Thoroughly summarizes school-suspension due process requirements from the policy/handbook investigated. Due process details are clear.

25 points

Thoroughly summarizes school-suspension due process requirements from the policy/handbook investigated. Summary expertly distinguishes due process requirements between short-term and long-term suspensions.

Due Process Procedures Answer

Answers question, are the due process procedures for a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student the same or different?

0 points

Does not answer the question, are the due process procedures for a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student the same or different.

11.1 points

Answer is unclear and does not provide concrete information of whether or not the due process procedures are the same or different.

11.85 points

Adequately answers if the due process procedures are the same or different. Answer may lack some clarity.

13.05 points

Thoroughly answers if the due process procedures are the same or different. Due process details are clear.

15 points

Comprehensively answers if the due process procedures are the same or different. Includes specific details to support claim.

Requirements Consistency Answer

Answers question, are these requirements consistent with Goss v. Lopez? Support your position with examples from case law, the U.S. Constitution, or other readings.

0 points

Essay has little or nothing to do with school policy or Goss v. Lopez. No examples provided.

22.2 points

Inadequate comparison of school policy or Goss v. Lopez. Essay is overly simplistic, and few details are given.

23.7 points

Adequate comparison of the school suspension procedures and Goss v. Lopez. Only one example provided.

26.1 points

Clear, well-crafted comparison of school suspension procedures and Goss v. Lopez. More than one relevant example provided.

30 points

Thorough and detailed comparison of school suspension procedures and Goss v. Lopez. Several relevant examples are provided that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

5.18 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

5.53 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

6.09 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, Conclusion and 500-750-word count

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. Essay meets 500-750-word count.

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered. Minimum word count is not met.

5.92 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. Minimum word count is not met.

6.32 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. Minimum word count is met.

6.96 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. Minimum word count is met.

8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. Minimum word count is met.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

3.7 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

3.95 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

4.35 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

5 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

3.7 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

3.95 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

4.35 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

3.7 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

3.95 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

4.35 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.